This article does not discuss budget allocation or constitutionality, which needs to be clarified by the relevant authorities. Instead, it aims to explore the implications behind the “Logging Ban Compensation.” Specifically, it examines whether the traditional concept of communal ownership among Indigenous peoples should lead to the publicization of social resources, given the relationship between ethnic development, industry sustainability, and land conservation. In an era dominated by individualism, can tribes resist the tide of privatization, or will they ultimately find their concepts hollow, industries unable to recover, and conservation efforts ineffective?
Source：The News Lens
